Drawing for AVENTURA

USPTO serial 77514342

AVENTURA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AVENTURA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D Krugman

GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recording and playing devices for sound and image carriers; DVD recorders; dual deck VCR and DVD recorders; DVD players; slot in DVD players; dual deck VCR and DVD players; combination TV monitors and VCR and DVD players; flat panel televisions; liquid crystal display (LCD) televisions; plasma display panel (PDP) televisions; LCD projectors used to display advertisements; multimedia projectors; digital tuner set top box; tuners for television and radio, namely, BS tuners, digital tuners, Hi-vision tuners, CS tuners, and tuners for receiving digital terrestrial television broadcast; printers; photo printers; inkjet printers; single function color inkjet printers; multifunction all-in one printers; color inkjet printers with copier and scanner; laser beam printers; monochrome laser beam printers; digital still cameras; 3 point 1 megapixel digital still cameras with 3x optical zoom; color televisions; flat CRT color televisions; video cassette recorders; 4 head high frequency video cassette recorders; video cassette players; CD players; CD recordersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 8, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 14, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 26, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 28, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance