Drawing for ASTRIA

USPTO serial 77514957

ASTRIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASTRIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah A. Peacock

DEBORAH A. PEACOCK PEACOCK MYERS, P.C.PO BOX 26927ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87125-6927UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009equipment for testing manufacturing machines, namely, probe cards, probe needles, probe stations, and probers; custom equipment for testing manufacturing machines, namely, probe cards, probe needles, probe stations, and probers; equipment and machines for testing of semiconductor devices, namely, probe cards, probe needles, probe stations, and probers; semiconductor substrate manufacturing testing machines, namely, probe cards, probe needles, probe stations, and probersACTIVE—
037repair and maintenance of equipment for testing manufacturing machines; repair and maintenance of custom equipment for testing manufacturing machines; repair and maintenance of equipment and machines for testing semiconductor devices; repair and maintenance of semiconductor substrate manufacturing testing machines; repair and maintenance of equipment for semiconductor fabrication and manufacturing machines and semiconductor fabrication and manufacturingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 8, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 13, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance