USPTO serial 77515817
RIVERLAND DESIGNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 3, 2012
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RIVERLAND DESIGNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Sebolt
Joseph A. Sebolt SAND & SEBOLT4940 Munson Street NWAegis Tower, Suite 1100Canton, OH 44718-3615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DECORATIVE MAGNETS; MECHANICAL DECORATIVE SIGNS; LUMINOUS DECORATIVE SIGNS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | PICTURE FRAMES, PHOTOGRAPH FRAMES; PLAQUES MADE OF BONE, IVORY, PLASTIC, WAX, OR WOOD; NON-METALLIC BOTTLE STOPPERS; RESIN ORNAMENTS; PLASTIC RESEALABLE GIFT BOXES, SOLD EMPTY; RESIN DECORATIVE SIGNS, WOOD DECORATIVE SIGNS; WOOD DECORATIVE PLAQUES, WOOD WALL PLAQUES AND WOOD COMMEMORATIVE PLAQUES, ALL FOR DECORATIVE USE ON A WALL OR ON A STAND; RESIN DECORATIVE PLAQUES, RESIN WALL PLAQUES AND RESIN COMMEMORATIVE PLAQUES, ALL FOR DECORATIVE USE ON A WALL OR ON A STAND | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Resin coasters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Giftcraft Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Giftcraft Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Giftcraft Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named RIVERLAND DESIGNS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |