USPTO serial 77516694
INSIDE AGROL 96% BIOBASED POLYOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2009
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INSIDE AGROL 96% BIOBASED POLYOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fayetteville, AR
Fayetteville, AR
Fayetteville, AR
FAYETTEVILLE, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trent C. Keisling
Trent C. Keisling KEISLING & PIEPER PLCP.O. BOX 10379FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | AGRICULTURALLY BASED POLYOLS FOR USE IN THE PRODUCTION OF POLYURETHANE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIOBASED CHEMICALS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BIOBASED CHEMICALS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BIOBASED CHEMICALS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BIOBASED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named INSIDE AGROL 96% BIOBASED POLYOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |