USPTO serial 77517172
SKYHOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKYHOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger H Bora
ROGER H BORA THOMPSON HINE LLP2000 COURTHOUSE PLZ NEDAYTON, OH 45402-1861UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Rigid metal packaging, namely, industrial shipping containers, waterproof shipping containers, storage container drums, storage tubs, shipping cartons and shipping cases, shipping crates, and storage boxes; metal cargo lifting slings; metal load restraint hardware, namely, straps, clamps, cables, carabineers, chains, turnbuckles and hooks; metal rigging chains for cargo; metal spreader bars; metal carabineers for securing and lifting cargo; metal hook and ring combinations; and hooks | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Aircraft; aircraft for use in connection with fire fighting, timber transport and heavy cargo transport; and cargo securing equipment, namely, cargo harnesses, and cargo restraints, namely, straps, clamps, cables, carabineers, chains, turnbuckles and hooks | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Metal storage racks; non-metal load resistant hardware, namely, screws, nuts, straps, clamps, cables, hooks, bolts, nuts and screws; non-metal spreader bars; and non-metal hook and ring combinations and hooks | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Air transportation, namely, aircraft piloting services; goods transportation services by air, rail, truck and water boat; consultation services in the fields of aviation and aerospace; emergency rescue and disaster relief services; and supply chain, logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, transportation and delivery of freight for others by air, rail, ship or truck | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SkyHook International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named SKYHOOK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |