Drawing for EPADERM

USPTO serial 77518031

EPADERM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPADERM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew N. Spivak

Andrew N. Spivak Mosaic Legal Group, PLLC5185 MacArthur Boulevard, NW, Suite 350Washington, DC 20016-3341UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003After sun creams; Anti-aging creams; Body creams; Cosmetic creams; Face and body creams; Face creams; Facial creams; Hand creams; Lip cream; Non-medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions; Non-medicated foot cream; Non-medicated ointments for the prevention and treatment of sunburn; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Non-medicated skin creams; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin creamsACTIVE—
005Analgesic balm; Analgesic preparations; Analgesics; Anti-inflammatory ointments; Anti-inflammatory salves; Anti-itch ointment; Gels, creams and solutions for dermatological use; Herbal topical creams, gels, salves, sprays, powder, balms, liniment and ointments for the relief of aches and pain; Medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions; Medicinal creams for skin care; Preparation for the relief of pain; Topical analgesicsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 5, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 13, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 23, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 29, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 29, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance