CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SOURCE VERIFIED CAPITAL GROUP

USPTO serial 77519192

SOURCE VERIFIED CAPITAL GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOURCE VERIFIED CAPITAL GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason R. Jenkins

Camille L. Urban Brown, Winick, Graves, Gross, Baskerville and Scho666 Grand Ave. - Suite 2000Ruan CenterDes Moines, IA 50309-2510

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036BROKERAGE OF FOODS, NAMELY, FOODS FOR WHICH ORIGINATION IS VALIDATEDACTIVE—
039WAREHOUSING SERVICES, NAMELY, STORAGE, DISTRIBUTION, PACKING AND SHIPPING OF FRESH AND PROCESSED MEAT PRODUCTSACTIVE—
040FOOD PROCESSING FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, MEAT PROCESSINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 18, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 7, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 23, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 23, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance