USPTO serial 77519313
MINDPOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINDPOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER L. WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTHFLOOR 3NAPLES, FL 34103-3590Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of nutraceuticals; plant extracts for use in the manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations in the form of lotions, creams, and topical analgesics and anesthetics, tablets, capsules, pills, tincture, suppositories and ampule for injection; botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals; chemical extracts and active principles extracted from medicinal plants for use in the manufacture of nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals; chemical extracts and active principles extracted from medicinal plants for use in the pharmaceutical industry, namely, chemical agents made from botanical extracts or association of chemical extracts for use in the manufacture of pharmaceutical or nutraceutical products; botanical extracts used in preparations in the form of lotions, creams, and topical analgesics and anesthetics, tablets, capsules, pills, lozenges, inhalers, tincture, suppositories and ampule for injection; botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of preparations in the form of lotions, creams, and topical analgesics and anesthetics, tablets, capsules, pills, lozenges, inhalers, tincture, suppositories and ampule for injection; botanical extracts used in the manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations in the form of lotions, creams, and topical analgesics and anesthetics, tablets, capsules, pills, tincture, suppositories and ampule for injection; botanical extracts for use in making cosmetics; herbal extracts, botanical extracts, preparations, and blends, mushroom, fungus, or spore extracts or blends, for use in the manufacture of foods, functional foods, medicinal foods or beverages; herbal extracts and blends for use in the manufacture of medicinal foods or beverages; botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations in the form of lotions, creams, and topical analgesics and anesthetics, tablets, capsules, pills, tincture, suppositories and ampule for injection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VR LABORATORIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HerbalScience Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HerbalScience Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named MINDPOWER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 4, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |