Drawing for LAZYTOWN

USPTO serial 77520083

LAZYTOWN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAZYTOWN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven R. Gursky, Mary L. Grieco, Safia A. Anand

Steven R. Gursky, Mary L. Grieco, Safia A. Anand Olshan Grundman Frome Rosenzweig & Wolosky, LLP65 E. 55th St.Park Avenue TowerNew York, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry, namely, bracelets, costume jewelry, identification bracelets, jewelry chains, jewelry boxes of precious metal, jewelry cases of precious metal, jewelry hat pins, pins being jewelry, rings being jewelry, watches, namely, wrist watches, watches containing a game function, clocks, namely, alarm clocks, clocks incorporating radios, wall clocksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 19, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 17, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 25, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 23, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Feb 23, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 24, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 25, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 25, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 8, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 23, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 23, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 21, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 16, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jul 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance