USPTO serial 77521092
CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4187026Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2012
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cleveland, OH
CLEVELAND, OH
Cleveland, OH
Cleveland, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George L. Pinchak
George L. Pinchak Tarrolli, Sunheim, Covell & Tummino LLP1300 East Ninth StreetSuite 1700Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mine management services, namely, managing the exploration, production and operations of mines for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 25, 2012 |
| 037 | Mining extraction of raw materials, namely, iron, ore, coal and natural gas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 25, 2012 |
| 040 | Refining and processing of raw materials, namely, iron, ore, coal and natural gas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 25, 2012 |
| 042 | Exploration of raw materials, namely, iron, ore, coal and natural gas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 25, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 3, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |