USPTO serial 77521991
B B T V BETTERBLACK TELEVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B B T V BETTERBLACK TELEVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sepehr Daghighian, Esq.
SEPEHR DAGHIGHIAN LAW OFFICES OF SEPEHR DAGHIGHIAN PC433 NORTH CAMDEN DRIVEFOURTH FLOORBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-4408Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, an on-going series featuring comedy, drama, and variety television shows provided through cable, satellite, and broadcast television networks; Entertainment, namely, production of television programs; Production of television programs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |