Drawing for TOP CUT

USPTO serial 77522898

TOP CUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOP CUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay L. Collins

Kay L. Collins SANTANGELO LAW OFFICES, P.C.125 S HOWES ST FL 3FORT COLLINS, CO 80521-2794UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat; meat cuts; frozen, fresh, or prepared beef, pork, lamb and poultry; ground meat, processed or cured meat and meat products, namely, ground beef patties, ham and smoked meats; bacon; sausage; jerky; dips; wild game; venison; elk; buffalo; deer; fowl; grouse; quail; pheasant; ostrich; fish; seafoodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 30, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 30, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 26, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 9, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance