USPTO serial 77523318
EX-S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EX-S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Metal working machines, namely, machining centers; metalworking machine tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |