Drawing for WAVI

USPTO serial 77525101

WAVI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAVI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Hartman

Andrew Hartman COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP777 6th Street, NW, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20001-2421UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical equipment and devices for non-invasive measurement of brain activity, namely, brain activity scannersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 6, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 23, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2009IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2009INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Sep 9, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance