USPTO serial 77525710
RAD EMPIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAD EMPIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laval, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene S. Winter
GENE S. WINTER ST. ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS LLC986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags, namely, sports bags, gym bags, beach bags, diaper bags, backpacks, handbags, travel bags, school bags, shoe bags for travel, fanny packs, hiking bags, shoulder bags, tote bags, baby carriers worn on the body | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, sweaters, T-shirts, camisoles, vests, cardigans, turtlenecks, dresses, underwear, culottes, midriff tops, slips, pants, jeans, jackets, Bermuda shorts, shorts, skirts, suits, jumpsuits, overalls, blouses, blazers, ski suits, overcoats, parkas, anoraks, raincoats, rain slickers, sweatshirts, hooded sweatshirts, jerseys, jogging outfits, mittens, gloves, pajamas, nightgowns, baby doll pajamas, nighties, dressing gowns, bathrobes, sleeping garments, baby bibs not of paper, beachwear, swim suits, leotards, coats, slipovers, polo shirts, boxer shorts; headwear, namely, hats, skull caps, berets, headbands, kerchiefs, ear muffs, toques, caps; fashion accessories, namely, belts, suspenders, neckties, scarves, bandannas; footwear, namely, street shoes, leisure shoes, sports footwear, beach footwear, children's footwear, evening footwear, exercise footwear, fishing footwear, golf footwear, winter footwear, rain footwear, ski footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |