USPTO serial 77526128
BAREFOOT CONTESSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAREFOOT CONTESSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Hampton, NY
East Hampton, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy DiConza
JOHN P MARGIOTTA FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit-based snack foods; potato-based snack foods; vegetable-based snack foods; nut and seed-based snack bars; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; processed nuts; dips; dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Grain-based snack foods; grain-based chips; grain-based food bars also containing dried fruits and nuts; granola snacks; snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; snack cakes; cookies; crackers; bakery goods; bakery desserts; dessert puddings; brownies; candy; salad dressings; sauces; marinades; spice rubs; flavor enhancers used in food products; frozen appetizers consisting primarily of dough | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |