USPTO serial 77529365
DIGIPASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 26, 2009
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DIGIPASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHICAGO, IL
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McGlynn
John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestia2200 Renaissance Blvd Suite 350King of Prussia, PA 19406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | authentication tokens and software used for the protection of on-line transactions and data transfer by electronic means; authentication tokens and software for access control to computers, electronic networks, databases, and physical spaces; authentication tokens and software for electronic generation of authentication credentials and signatures; smart card readers and encoded smart cards containing programs used for performing cryptographic functions, generating or verifying credentials; all of the above excluding document scanners, software for use in document scanners or for use with document scanners | ACTIVE | Oct 23, 1996 |
| 042 | [ computer consultation, namely, consultation in the field of data security; computer security services, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media, and individuals; online security services, namely, providing security for electronic transactions; software design, updating and maintenance; computer security services, namely, protecting computers and databases against unauthorized access ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ONESPAN NORTH AMERICA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Vasco Data Security, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vasco Data Security, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vasco Data Security, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIGIPASS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 26, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 26, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |