USPTO serial 77530959
I
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Menlo Park, CA
Menlo Park, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne H. Peck
ANNE H. PECK COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP777 6TH STREET NWSUITE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20001-2421Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on the Internet; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software interfaces for the function of creating a personalized on-line information service whereby the user can post user-defined information and personal profiles and information; computer services, namely, creating indexes of information, indexes of web sites and indexes of other information resources available on global computer networks and creating and maintaining websites for others; providing information at the specific request of end-users by means of a global computer network, and data mining by means of global computer networks; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in designing websites, web pages and blogs; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in database management, for creating a spreadsheet, and for word processing; providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for tracking documents over computer networks, intranets and the Internet; providing on-line non-downloadable software for document collaboration and revision tracking; providing on-line non-downloadable software for granting and controlling access to documents; providing on-line non-downloadable software for managing individual and group calendars and schedules; providing on-line non-downloadable software for tracking, managing, and optimizing advertising and promotional campaigns, and calculating return on investment in connection with the same; providing on-line non-downloadable software for tracking website traffic, e-commerce activity, customer loyalty, and sales conversion rates; providing on-line non-downloadable software for optimizing website navigation; providing online non-downloadable software for managing, collecting, monitoring and analyzing web, blog and other online site traffic, user preferences and links in real time; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of problems of software for managing, collecting, monitoring and analyzing web, blog and other online site traffic, user preferences and links; design and development services for others of software for managing, collecting, monitoring and analyzing web, blog and other online site traffic, user preferences and links; troubleshooting of computer software problems; providing on-line non-downloadable software for the storage of on-line documents | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |