USPTO serial 77531184
CARDIOLOGIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARDIOLOGIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Naresh Kilaru
Naresh Kilaru Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LL901 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mid-Atlantic Medical Research Centers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mid-Atlantic Medical Research Centers, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named CARDIOLOGIST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |