USPTO serial 77533074
INQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NASSAU, NEW PROVIDENCE, BS
Douglas, IM
NASSAU, NEW PROVIDENCE, BS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile telephones; mobile Internet devices, namely, mobile telephones, computers, computer tablets, personal digital assistants with internet connecting capability; electronic memory cards; mobile network credit top-up cards, namely, credit or debit cards with a unique code through which, once verified through the mobile network provider, consumers can redeem pre-paid credit for a mobile service account; stands for telephones; telephone earpieces; cases for mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, printed guides for marketing, advertising and selling mobile telephone and mobile Internet devices, mobile telephone and data network services, and mobile telephone and data network applications; printed instructional and teaching materials, in the field of mobile telephones, mobile Internet devices, mobile telephone services, data network services, mobile telephone applications and data network applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services featuring mobile telephone and mobile Internet devices; on-line retail store services featuring mobile telephone and mobile Internet devices; provision of information and advice relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, mobile telephone services and mobile Internet services; provision of an electronic top-up credit system for mobile telecommunications services, namely, an on-line system to issue a unique code or to issue a card with a unique pre-printed code, each of which consumers can redeem pre-paid credit for a mobile service account, once verified by the phone network provider; electronic mail services; providing user access to the Internet; providing telecommunications connections to the Internet or databases; providing online interactive bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; provision of information and advice relating to the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of telecommunications apparatus all to the order and or specification of others; provision of information and advice relating to the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design consultancy services in the field of mobile telephones and mobile Internet devices; design of telecommunications apparatus, mobile telephone handsets and accessories for mobile telephone handsets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INQ ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Palmerston Limited
- Other trademarks owned by INQ ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INQ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |