USPTO serial 77533322
INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS ANOINTMENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS ANOINTMENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf, Esq.
SHERRI L. ROHLF, ESQ. SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER, P.A.100 WASHINGTON AVE S STE 1300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, spray and sculpting gels, hair color, and waving lotions; skin care products, namely, soap, moisturizers, toners, skin cleaning creams, lotions and bath gels, body and facial lotions, masks and astringents; cosmetics, namely, lipstick, eye shadow, foundation, blush, face powder, concealer, eye pencils, lip pencils and mascara; personal hygiene products, namely, shower gels, body oils and body lotions, skin crèmes, skin lotions, skin emollients, moisturizing body oils and body lotions; and household cleaning products, namely, all purpose cleaners, dish detergent, laundry detergent, and cleaners for use on fabric, floors, walls, and windows; breath fresheners; and scented oils; perfumes, colognes, fragrances for personal use, body oil, essential oils, incense and room fragrances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS ANOINTMENTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |