USPTO serial 77536272
LENNY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LENNY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lenny Comercios e Confeccoes Ltda
Ipanema Rio de Janeiro, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Epstein
JEFFREY H. EPSTEIN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | ATHLETIC BAGS, BEACH BAGS, BOOK BAGS, CARRY-ALL BAGS, DUFFLE BAGS; HANDBAGS; TRAVEL BAGS; WALLETS; BACKPACKS, SUITCASES; PURSES; KEYHOLDERS, NAMELY, KEY CASES; BRIEFCASES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |