USPTO serial 77536871
ECO-GROUPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECO-GROUPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul M. Ulrich
PAUL M. ULRICH DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLPONE SOUTH MAIN STREETONE DAYTON CENTRE - SUITE 1300DAYTON, OH 45402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mobile and/or modular manufacturing cells, namely, plastic injection mold machines, blow mold machines, and extrusion mold machines for fabricating and manufacturing products, namely, injection molded, blow molded and/or extrusion molded plastic and/or preforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECOVISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ECOVISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Enkon, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named ECO-GROUPE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |