Drawing for CFA

USPTO serial 77537895

CFA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CFA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George A. Herbster

GEORGE A HERBSTER 100 CUMMINGS CENTERSUITE 213CBEVERLY, MA 01915UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management; Business management and consultation in the field of industrial management assistance services and in the field of problem solving; Business management consultancy services; Commercial and industrial management assistanceABANDONED—
041Education services, namely, providing training by conducting workshops and lectures in the field of problem solving, namely, problem solving for optimizing the performance of business, manufacturing and technical processes; Educational services, namely, providing education by conducting workshops and lectures in the fields of problem solving, namely, problem solving for optimizing the performance of business, manufacturing and technical processesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 26, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 26, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 26, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 16, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 16, 2010OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 13, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance