Drawing for JET STARCLASS

USPTO serial 77539222

JET STARCLASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JET STARCLASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sam Hudson, Esq.

SAM HUDSON, ESQ. FOLEY HOAG LLP155 SEAPORT BLVD STE 1600BOSTON, MA 02210-2600UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Provision of accommodation services, namely, booking and reserving temporary accommodation; travel agency services relating to obtaining meals and accommodation for travelers; provision of food and beverages, namely, restaurant, lounge, cafeteria, bar, catering services for travelers; arranging and booking temporary accommodations via electronic contact and communication with airline customers; providing information about accommodations via electronic contact and communication with airline customers, all the aforesaid being in relation to airline servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2010ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED
Jun 14, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 27, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 4, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 5, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 4, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 28, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 24, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 24, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 21, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 9, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Aug 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance