USPTO serial 77539284
AQUAMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUAMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DEERFIELD, IL
DEERFIELD, IL
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Irvine, CA
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Irvine, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rajiv Yadav
RAJIV YADAV EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES1 EDWARDS WAYIRVINE, CA 92614-5688UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical filters, namely, filters for use in haemofiltration, dialysis, haemodialysis, haemodiafiltration, and other renal replacement therapies; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, and not for use in laboratory instruments, namely, liquid handling systems for use with microplate readers used in connection with assay development, drug discovery, or lifesciences research | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named AQUAMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2009 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |