Drawing for TRIHEALIX REVENUE MAXIMIZER

USPTO serial 77539748

TRIHEALIX REVENUE MAXIMIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOONE, JOHN C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIHEALIX REVENUE MAXIMIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey C. Katz

JEFFREY C. KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036providing an Internet-based program, platform and tool to help healthcare providers determine patient financial responsibility and eligibility at the point of service; providing electronic payment processing services to healthcare providers; providing a platform and tool to identify individuals eligible for public assistance and charity care; and generating prefilled applications relating to the foregoingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 9, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance