USPTO serial 77540474
SUNPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzanne K. Ketler
Suzanne K. Ketler Roetzel & Andress222 South Main StreetAkron, OH 44308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Sunscreens not including preparations, solutions, sprays, lotions, or liquids used for the purpose of artificial tanning | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |