USPTO serial 77540537
ARMAMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARMAMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Lee, Jr.
ROBERT E. LEE, JR. ELI LILLY AND COMPANYLILLY CORPORATE CENTERINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46285UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Veterinary preparations for companion animals in the treatment of weight loss, obesity, urine spraying, chronic pain, gastrointestinal disorders, neurodegenerative disorders, parasitic infestations, neurological disorders, anxiety, hypertension, dermatitis, cancer, anemia associated with chronic renal failure, fleas, pain associated with orthopedic and soft tissue surgery, chronic kidney disease, and emesis; preparations for destroying vermin, namely, insecticides for use with livestock and livestock premises; veterinary preparations for the treatment, control and symptomatic relief of infectious and metabolic diseases of livestock; dietary food supplements for animals; antibacterial pharmaceuticals; production enhancement for livestock, namely, medicated feed and medicated water additives; medicated feed additives and medicated water additives for animals; diagnostic agents, preparations and substances to identify pathogens or residues of biological interest for veterinary use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |