USPTO serial 77540739
GREEN CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4068760Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2011
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREEN CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Sipiora
DAVID E. SIPIORA Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1400 WEWATTA STREET, SUITE 600DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | MATTRESSES; BEDS; MATTRESS FOUNDATIONS; FURNITURE; PILLOWS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 26, 2011 |
| 024 | COMFORTERS, DUVETS, PILLOW SHAMS, COVERLETS, BEDSPREADS, BED SHEETS, BED SKIRTS, BED BLANKETS, LAP BLANKETS, BLANKET THROWS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 26, 2011 |
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING BEDROOM FURNITURE, MATTRESSES, BEDDING AND PILLOWS; ONLINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING BEDROOM FURNITURE, MATTRESSES, BEDDING AND PILLOWS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 26, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Denver Mattress Co., LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Denver Mattress Co., LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named GREEN CHOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |