USPTO serial 77541576
O2 COOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with O2 COOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | BATTERY OPERATED FANS USED AS PERSONAL ACCESSORIES, NAMELY HANDHELD OPERATED FANS INCLUDING THOSE WITH FLASHING LIGHTS AND WRITING TOOLS, DESK FANS INCLUDING BOTH OSCILLATING END NON-OSCILLATING, WEARABLE FANS INCLUDING VISOR FANS, NECKLACE FANS AND WRIST-MOUNTED FANS, FANS MOUNTED ON OR INCORPORATING DRINKING VESSELS, CLIP-ON FANS OR CLAMP-ON FANS, SUCH AS DESK-MOUNTED AND VEHICLE MOUNTED AND WITH OR WITHOUT FLEXIBLE NECKS, FANS INCORPORATING LAMPS OR LIGHTS, AND FANS INCORPORATING A DECORATIVE ENCLOSURE AND FOR DIFFUSING A FRAGRANCE | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 021 | drinking vessels, namely, water hydration packs and sports bottles sold empty | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 028 | toy fans and water squirting toys | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |