Drawing for ACENTEC

USPTO serial 77542024

ACENTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACENTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark H. Plager

MARK H. PLAGER PLAGER LAW OFFICES PC16152 BEACH BOULEVARD SUITE 207HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Independent sales representative in the field of medical softwareABANDONEDJan 2, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2009MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 2009ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 13, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 27, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance