USPTO serial 77542618
COMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mayfield Heights, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colleen F. Goss
Colleen F. Goss FAY SHARPE LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Internet service provider (ISP); Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for enabling and managing uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media, photographs, videos, or information over the Internet, wireless networks, cellular phones, or other communications networks; Software for enabling and managing uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media, photographs, videos, or information over the Internet, wireless networks, cellular phones, or other communications network; Software for distributing, photographs and real-time video and audio through wireless devices; Advertising and advertisement, promotion and marketing services for providing electronic media or information over the Internet, wireless networks, cellular phones, or other communications network; audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet wireless networks, cellular phones, or other communications networks, namely, uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging and electronically transmitting information, photographs, and audio and video clips; Providing access to information, photographs, audio, and video via websites, online forums, chat rooms, and blogs over the Internet; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; Education and entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring audio clips, video clips, musical performances, musical videos, film clips, photographs, other multimedia materials, and information in the field of audio clips, video clips, musical performances, musical videos, film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; Blogs featuring information in the field of audio clips, video clips, musical performances, musical videos, film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; Software to enable taking a picture on a cellular phone and uploading it to another cellular phone, internet site or retail store for printing through servers; Software to enable capturing pictures, audio or video and forwarding to media organizations for posting on websites or live to air; Providing access to servers to enable uploading photographs to another cellular phone, internet site or retail store for printing; Providing access to servers to enable capturing pictures, audio or video and forwarding to media organizations for posting on websites or live to air | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |