USPTO serial 77544516
HEALTH TALKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTH TALKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Bergman
MICHAEL BERGMAN BERGMAN & SONG, LLPPO BOX 400198CAMBRIDGE, MA 02140-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Word-of-mouth and nontraditional marketing programs; providing information about the goods and services of others via the Internet; providing consumer product information via the Internet; providing advertising, marketing and promotional services for the pharmaceutical and medical products of others | ACTIVE | Jul 11, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 5, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |