USPTO serial 77544522
WHAT'S YOUR WOW? SMILE IT FEELS GOOD WOWPICK TOOTHPICK WITH WORDS OF WISDOM!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHAT'S YOUR WOW? SMILE IT FEELS GOOD WOWPICK TOOTHPICK WITH WORDS OF WISDOM!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Southern Harbour, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fay O'Brien
FAY O'BRIEN O'BRIEN TM SERVICES688 TWEEDSMUIR AVEOTTAWA; ONTARIO, K1Z5P6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | (Based on Intent to Use) Toothpicks(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Toothpicks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |