USPTO serial 77544592
SYNEXUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SYNEXUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chorley, Lancashire, GB
Chorley, Lancashire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest W. Grumbles
ERNEST W GRUMBLES III ADAMS MONAHAN LLP60 SOUTH 6TH STREETSUITE 2540MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Personnel recruitment and selection services for others; recruitment of patients to clinical trials; recruitment advertising services relating to clinical trials of others; employment agency services; business management of clinical trials for others; industrial analysis services, namely, industrial management consultation including cost/yield analysis; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |