Drawing for HYBRID

USPTO serial 77545313

HYBRID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYBRID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Joseph English

D. JOSEPH ENGLISH DUANE MORRIS LLP505 9TH STREET, N.W.SUITE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ELECTRIC IR HALOGEN LIGHT BULBS AND HALOGEN CAPSULES FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT BULBSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 18, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 18, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 4, 2010RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 4, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 30, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 30, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance