USPTO serial 77545321
VIEWSFLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSEN, EMILY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIEWSFLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London Ec3a 6df, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Alexander Floum
D. ALEXANDER FLOUM THE WILLIAMS FIRM1850 MT. DIABLO BLVD., SUITE 340WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing information, news and commentary in the fields of advertising and business; running advertisements for other companies; running banners for other companies; arranging and conducting business conferences; arranging and conducting business conferences via an on line electronic communications network; advertising services, namely the dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network; advertising services, namely the dissemination of advertising for others in television media; advertising services, namely the dissemination of advertising for others in print media; electronic banners; providing financial and economic statistics and data; internet based business news and business news analysis services | ACTIVE | Aug 12, 2008 |
| 041 | Providing information, news and commentary in the fields of education and entertainment; Providing information, news and commentary in the fields of education and entertainment, namely, fashion; Providing information, news and commentary in the fields of education and entertainment, namely, food and dining; Providing information, news and commentary in the fields of education and entertainment, namely, sports; Providing information, news and commentary in the fields of education and entertainment, namely, celebrities; publication of newspapers; publication of books; publication of articles; publication of magazines; publication of electronic books; production of television programs; creation of television programs; production of web-based television programs; creation of web-based television programs; production of webcasts; creation of webcasts; production of podcasts; creation of podcasts; arranging and conducting educational conferences; arranging and conducting entertainment-related conferences | ACTIVE | Aug 12, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |