Drawing for SCULLY RANCH

USPTO serial 77545420

SCULLY RANCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCULLY RANCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah Davis Han

Deborah Davis Han Howard Rice et alia3 Embarcadero Center 7th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-4024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Foods and beverages made from fresh, dried, canned, preserved or processed fruits and/or vegetables, namely, candied fruits, canned fruits, canned vegetables, dehydrated fruit snacks, dehydrated vegetable snacks, dried fruit mixes, dried vegetable mixes, dried fruits, dried vegetables, frozen fruits, frozen vegetables, fruit preserves, fruit purees, fruit-based food beverages, fruit-based snack foods, fruit-based spreads, jams, jellies, pickled fruits, pickled vegetables, preserved fruits, preserved vegetables, processed fruits, processed vegetables, vegetable paste, vegetable puree, vegetable-based food beverages, vegetable-based snack foods, vegetable-based spreadsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 19, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 17, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2008RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Nov 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance