USPTO serial 77545810
Serial No. 77545810
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 77545810?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina A. Carvalho
CRISTINA A CARVALHO ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Pet food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 29, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 27, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |