USPTO serial 77546607
HOLMES & YANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOLMES & YANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N. Weisman
GREGORY N. WEISMAN Ritholz Levy Sanders Chidekel & Fields, LLP2029 CENTURY PARK EAST19TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Handbags; Purses; Luggage; Briefcases; Toiletry cases sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by K Holmes, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by K Holmes, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HOLMES & YANG, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named HOLMES & YANG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |