Drawing for SIR PRIZE

USPTO serial 77546894

SIR PRIZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIR PRIZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David R. Josephs

DAVID R. JOSEPHS BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES, LTD.101 DYER ST FL 5PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-3926UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software for gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; Gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 3, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 2, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 13, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 10, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 2, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 12, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 12, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 26, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance