USPTO serial 77547148
PURE DARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURE DARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina A. Carvalho
Cristina A. Carvalho Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWTM DocketWashington, DC 20036-5339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutritional energy bars for use as a meal substitute; nutritionally fortified beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | cereal-based energy bars; breakfast cereals; ready-to-eat cereals; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, hot drinking chocolate | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-carbonated fruit drinks and smoothies, energy drinks, and non-carbonated chocolate soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mars, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Mars, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PURE DARK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |