USPTO serial 77547687
GUMMY BEAR YUMMY'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GUMMY BEAR YUMMY'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. Brackey II
Thomas A. Brackey II Freund & Brackey LLP427 North Camden DriveBeverly Hills, CA 90210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cereal-based snack foods; Chewing gum; Chewing gums; Chocolate bars; Chocolate candies; Cookie dough; Cookie mixes; Cookies; Cookies and crackers; Corn flakes; Crackers; Cup cakes; Dessert puddings; Dried pasta; Edible cake decorations; Edible decorations for cakes; Edible fruit ices; Edible ices; Flavored and sweetened gelatins; Flavored ices; Flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; Flavoring syrup; Frosting mixes; Frostings; Frozen confectionery; Frozen confections; Frozen confections, namely, freezer pops; Frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; Frozen yogurt; Fruit flavourings, except essences; Fruit ice; Fruit ice bar; Fruit ices; Fruit jellies; Fruit pies; Gelato; Gift baskets containing candy; Grain-based snack foods; Granola; Granola snacks; Granola-based snack bars; Gummy candies; Honey; Ice cream; Ice cream sandwiches; Ice cream substitute; Ice creams; Ice for refreshment; Ice milk; Ice milk bars; Ice-cream; Ice-cream cakes; Ices and ice creams; Icing; Icing mixes; Instant pudding mixes; Italian ice; Lollipops; Macaroni; Macaroni and cheese; Marshmallow; Marshmallow topping; Marshmallows; Milk chocolate; Milk shakes; Mixes for bakery goods; Mixes for making baking batters; Muffin mixes; Muffins; Oatmeal; Pancake syrup; Pasta; Pizzas; Prepared pasta; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; Processed cereals; Puddings; Ready-to-eat cereals; Rice-based snack foods; Shakes; Shaved ice confections; Sherbet; Sherbets; Snack cakes; Snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; Sorbet; Sorbets; Spaghetti; Sugar-free chewing gum; Sugarfree sweets; Sugarless candies; Sugarless chewing gum; Sugarless sweets; Sweets; Table syrup | ABANDONED | Aug 14, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 28, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |