Drawing for LOCAL EDUCATION LECTURE GATEWAY

USPTO serial 77547806

LOCAL EDUCATION LECTURE GATEWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOCAL EDUCATION LECTURE GATEWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D, Lanquist, Jr.

Edward D, Lanquist, Jr. Waddey & Patteron, P.C.1600 Division StreetSuite 500 Roundabout PlazaNashville, TN 37203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an on-line database that stores and tracks promotional marketing initiation and planning informationACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting lectures concerning medical health care professionals and distribution of instructional and teaching material in connection therewith, all in the field of medical and health care, and providing an on-line database that stores and tracks educational lecture initiation and planning informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jul 12, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 8, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2010IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2010INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jun 10, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 24, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 24, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 9, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance