USPTO serial 77549484
IDEAL-FIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3862442Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2010
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDEAL-FIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft
Heidenheim, DE
Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft
Heidenheim, DE
Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft
Heidenheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
R PETER SPIES DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1633UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Sanitary preparations for medical use; medical and surgical plasters; sticking plasters for medical use; bandages for dressings; burn dressings; dressings for wounds, burns, surgery; gauze for dressings; medical and surgical dressings; self adhesive dressings; wound dressings; wound dressings, namely, pledgets; medical and surgical dressings laced with contrast media and detection chips for use with in-vivo imaging and x-ray; all purpose disinfectants; sanitary napkins, panty liners, feminine hygiene pads, incontinence pads, sanitary pads; securing pants for securing absorbent pads for incontinent use | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Orthopedic articles, namely, elastic bandages for orthopaedic use, medical compression stockings and tights, orthopedic support bandages, orthopedic support bandage, namely, wearable pads for the hands, orthopedic supports, padding for orthopedic casts, plaster casts for orthopedic purposes, orthopedic and surgical splints; suture materials; draw-sheets for sick-beds and incontinence sheets | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named IDEAL-FIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2015 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |