USPTO serial 77549524
Serial No. 77549524
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 77549524?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Suarez Marshall
KATHRYN SUAREZ MARSHALL WASSERMAN, COMDEN & CASSELMAN LLP5567 RESEDA BLVD STE 330TARZANA, CA 91356-2699UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Jeans | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |