USPTO serial 77549734
SUPERSPRINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 22, 2009
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SUPERSPRINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SuperSprings, International, Inc.
Carpinteria, CA, US
SuperSprings, International, Inc.
Carpinteria, CA, US
SuperSprings, International, Inc.
Carpinteria, CA, US
SuperSprings, International, Inc.
Carpinteria, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph D. Chabot
Ralph D. Chabot Law Office of Ralph D. Chabot803 Camarillo Springs Rd.Camarillo, CA 93012United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | land vehicle parts, namely, suspension stabilizers for sport utility vehicles, vans, pickup trucks and mini vehicles and not used for antique/vintage automobiles, antique/vintage trucks, street rods, hot rods and custom vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SuperSprings, International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SuperSprings, International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SuperSprings, International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SuperSprings, International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SUPERSPRINGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2025 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 2, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 2, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |