USPTO serial 77549752
THE MATCHING EXPERTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE MATCHING EXPERTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Carstens
DAVID W. CARSTENS CARSTENS & CAHOON, LLPPO BOX 802334DALLAS, TX 75380-2334UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Personal coaching services in the field of dating, compatibility, social relationships, personal improvement, self-development and self awareness | ACTIVE | Jul 20, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |