Drawing for MANNINGTON COMMERCIAL

USPTO serial 77550074

MANNINGTON COMMERCIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANNINGTON COMMERCIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherry H. Flax

SHERRY H. FLAX SAUL EWING LLP500 E PRATT ST STE 900BALTIMORE, MD 21202-3170UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Rubber cove bases; Rubber floor tiles; Rubber flooringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 5, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 5, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 28, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 21, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance